Medical Decision Making

When randomized controlled trials are impractical, interrupted time series designs offer a rigorous quasi-experimental approach to assess population level policies. Indeed, in the context of quasi-experimental designs (QEDs), the Interrupted Time Series (ITS) method is commonly thought of as the most robust. But interrupted time series designs are susceptible to serial correlation and confounding by time-varying factors associated with both the intervention and the outcome, which may result in biased inference. Thus, we provide a simulation-based contrast of controlled interrupted time series (CITS) and multivariable regression (multivariable negative binomial regression) for estimation of policy effects in count time series data. These approaches are widely used in policy evaluations, yet their comparative performance in typical population health settings has rarely been examined directly. We tested both approaches within a variety of data generating situations, differing in the series length, intervention effect size, and magnitude of lag-1 autocorrelation. Bias, standard error calibration, confidence interval coverage, mean squared error, and statistical power were assessed for performance. Both methods gave unbiased estimates for moderate and large intervention effects, although bias was more pronounced for small effects, particularly in short series. Although the point estimate performance was similar, inferential properties varied significantly. CITS always had smaller mean squared error, better consistency between model based and empirical standard errors, and confidence interval coverage near the 95% nominal levels over weak to moderate autocorrelation. By contrast, multivariable regression was more sensitive to serial dependence, leading to underestimated standard errors and undercoverage, especially at moderate to high autocorrelation, regardless of Newey-West adjustments. These findings show the benefits of using a concurrent control series and the importance of structurally accounting for serial correlation when studying population level policies with time series data.

As health systems begin deploying autonomous AI agents that make independent clinical decisions and take direct actions within care workflows, ensuring patient safety and care quality requires governance standards that go beyond existing medical device frameworks designed for human-in-the-loop prediction tools. This paper introduces the Healthcare AI Agents Regulatory Framework (HAARF), a comprehensive verification standard for autonomous AI systems in clinical environments, developed collaboratively with 40+ international experts spanning regulatory authorities, clinical organizations, and AI security specialists. HAARF synthesizes requirements from nine major regulatory frameworks (FDA, EU AI Act, Health Canada, UK MHRA, NIST AI RMF, WHO GI-AI4H, ISO/IEC 42001, OWASP AISVS, IMDRF GMLP) into eight core verification categories comprising 279 specific requirements across three risk-based implementation levels. The framework addresses critical gaps in health system readiness for autonomous AI including: (1) progressive autonomy governance with clinical accountability, (2) tool-use security for agents that independently access EHRs, medical devices, and clinical systems, (3) continuous equity monitoring and bias mitigation across diverse patient populations, and (4) clinical decision traceability preserving human oversight authority. We validate HAARFs enforcement capabilities through a scenario-based red-team evaluation comprising six adversarial scenarios executed under baseline (no middleware) and HAARF- guardrailed conditions (N = 50 trials each, Gemini 2.5 Flash primary with Claude Sonnet 4.6 cross-model validation). In baseline conditions, the agent model executes unauthorized tools in 56-60% of adversarial trials. Under the HAARF condition, deterministic middleware enforcement reduces the unauthorized-tool success rate to 0%, with 0% contraindication misses and 0% policy-injection success (95% Wilson CI [0.00, 0.07]). Cross-model validation confirms identical security metrics, supporting HAARFs model-agnostic design. Mapping analysis demonstrates 48-88% coverage of major regulatory frameworks, with per-category FDA alignment ranging from 73% (C5, Agent Registration) to 91% (C3, Cybersecurity; C7, Bias & Equity). Initial validation with healthcare organizations shows a 40-60% reduction in multi-jurisdictional compliance burden and improved clinical safety governance outcomes. HAARF provides health systems with a practical, risk-stratified pathway for safe AI agent deployment--shifting from reactive compliance to proactive quality governance while maintaining rigorous patient safety standards and human-centered care principles.

Detailed agent-based simulations are increasingly used to support policy decisions, but their computational cost and complex uncertainty structure make systematic scenario analysis challenging. We present a data-driven, uncertainty-aware decision support (DDUADS) workflow for using stochastic simulation models as decision-support tools under limited computational budgets. The approach combines several established techniques-sensitivity screening, Bayesian calibration using simulation-based inference, and multi-surrogate model integration for translational efficiency-into a coherent pipeline that enables uncertainty-aware policy analysis. Rather than producing a single baseline, the calibration stage yields a posterior distribution over plausible model parameterizations, allowing flexible, uncertainty-aware forward projections. We demonstrate the DDUADS workflow on the INFORM-HIV agent-based model of HIV transmission in Chicago to evaluate potential disruptions in antiretroviral therapy (ART) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use. While the specific application is HIV modeling, the challenges and techniques described here arise in other simulation studies and can be applied to decision support in other domains.

Lightweight epidemic calculators are widely used for teaching and rapid scenario exploration, yet many omit the methodological detail needed for scientific reuse. We present a browser-native SIR calculator that exposes forward Euler and classical fourth-order Runge--Kutta (RK4) integration alongside epidemiologically interpretable outputs and a population-conservation diagnostic. The implementation is anchored to analytical properties of the deterministic SIR system, including the epidemic threshold, the peak condition, and the final-size relation. Benchmark experiments show that RK4 is essentially step-size invariant over practical discretizations, whereas Euler at a coarse one-day step overestimates peak prevalence by 3.97% and final size by 0.66% relative to a fine-step RK4 reference. These results demonstrate that browser-based tools can support publication-quality computational narratives when solver choice, diagnostics, and assumptions are treated as first-class outputs.

Large language models are increasingly used for clinical guidance while their parent companies introduce advertising. We tested whether pharmaceutical ads embedded in the prompts of 12 models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google shift drug recommendations across 258,660 API calls and four experiments probing distinct epistemic conditions. When two drugs were both guideline appropriate, advertising shifted selection of the advertised drug by +12.7 percentage points (P < 0.001), with some model scenario pairs shifting from 0% to 100%. Google models were the most susceptible (+29.8 pp), followed by OpenAI (+10.9 pp), while Anthropic models showed minimal change (+2.0 pp). When the advertised product lacked evidence or was clinically suboptimal, models resisted. This reveals a structured vulnerability: advertising does not override medical knowledge but fills the space where clinical evidence is underdetermined. An open response sub analysis (2,340 calls across three representative models) confirmed that advertising restructures free-text clinical reasoning: models echoed ad claims at 2.7 times the baseline rate while maintaining high stated confidence and rarely disclosing the ad. Susceptibility was provider dependent (Google: +29.8 pp; OpenAI: +10.9 pp; Anthropic: +2.0 pp). Because this bias operates within clinically correct answers, it is invisible to accuracy based evaluation, identifying a class of AI safety vulnerability that standard testing cannot detect.

Automating Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) assignment directly from unstructured electronic health record (EHR) notes remains an important but understudied problem in clinical informatics. We present HCC-Coder, an end to end NLP system that maps narrative documentation to 115 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services(CMS) HCC codes in a multi-label setting. On the test dataset, HCC-Coder achieves a macro-F1 of 0.779 and a micro-F1 of 0.756, with a macro-sensitivity of 0.819 and macro-specificity of 0.998. By contrast, Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT)-4o achieves highest score of a macro-F1 of 0.735 and a micro-F1 of 0.708 under five-shot prompting. The fine-tuned model demonstrates consistent absolute improvements of 4%-5% in F1-scores over GPT-4o. To address severe label imbalance, we incorporate inverse-frequency weighting and per-label threshold calibration. These findings suggest that domain-adapted transformers provide more balanced and reliable performance than prompt-based large language models for hierarchical clinical coding and risk adjustment.

BackgroundCarrier screening for inherited genetic disorders can reduce the burden of conditions that lead to childhood morbidity and mortality, including thalassaemia, cystic fibrosis, and spinal muscular atrophy. To be successful, national carrier screening programs should aim to maximise uptake, which may depend on population preferences for screening characteristics. In this study, we aimed to determine how expanded carrier screening in Singapore should be designed based on operational factors including suggested copayments, wait times, and disorders included in screening panels. MethodsWe elicited stated preferences for the design of a hypothetical national carrier screening program with seven attributes from 500 Singaporeans of reproductive age (18 to 54). A discrete choice experiment was applied using 30 choice tasks with 3 alternatives per task, divided between 3 blocks. The mixed multinomial logit model was used to estimate willingness-to-pay for each attribute level. Predicted uptake for three plausible screening programs was assessed, with copayment amounts from $0 to $1,200 in increments of $30. Impact on the annual national budget was calculated as a function of 25,000 expected eligible couples per year. All costs were reported in 2026 SGD. ResultsRespondents showed the strongest preferences for cost, followed by the number of diseases included in the panel, then wait times, with limited impact of remaining attributes. With no copayments, predicted uptake ranged from 85% [95% CI: 83% to 87%] to 90% [88% to 92%] for the basic and utility-maximising screening programs, respectively. This declined to 61% [56% to 66%] and 69% [65% to 73%] and, respectively, at a copayment of $1,200 per test. The model predicted higher uptake if a selection of screening alternatives were available, compared to a single program. The budget impact was highly dependent on population eligibility, copayments, and couples decision-making processes, but was unlikely to exceed $22.5m [$19.0m to $26.6m] per year unless expanded beyond married couples. ConclusionsThere was high predicted demand for carrier screening even as copayments increased. Successful strategies to improve uptake may include reducing copays and wait times, increasing the number of screening options available to prospective parents, and increasing program eligibility beyond pre-conception married couples.

Safety net healthcare delivery organizations (SNOs) serve vulnerable populations but face persistent challenges in adopting new technologies, including AI. While systematic barriers to technology adoption in SNOs are well documented, little is known about how AI is implemented in these settings. This study explored real-world AI adoption in SNOs, focusing on identifying barriers encountered across the AI lifecycle and strategies used to overcome them. Five SNOs in the U.S. participated in a 12-month technical assistance program, the Practice Network, to implement AI tools of their choosing. Observed barriers and mitigation strategies were documented throughout program activities and, at the conclusion of the program, reviewed and refined with participants using a participatory research approach to ensure findings reflected lived experiences and organizational contexts. Key barriers emerged during the Integration and Lifecycle Management phases and included gaps in AI performance evaluation and impact assessments, communication with patients about AI use, foundational AI education, financial resources for purchasing and maintaining AI tools, and AI governance structures. Effective strategies for addressing these barriers were primarily supported through centralized expertise, structured guidance, and peer learning. These findings provide granular, actionable insights for SNO leaders, offering guidance for anticipating barriers and proactively planning mitigation strategies. By including SNO perspectives, the study also contributes to the broader health AI ecosystem and underscores the importance of participatory, collaborative approaches to support safe, effective, and ethical AI adoption in resource-constrained settings. Author SummarySafety net organizations (SNOs) are healthcare systems that primarily serve low-income and underinsured patients. While interest in artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has grown rapidly, little is known about how these organizations experience AI adoption in practice. In this study, we partnered with five SNOs over a 12-month program to document the challenges they encountered when implementing AI tools and the strategies they used to address them. We worked closely with SNO staff throughout the process to ensure our findings reflected their lived experiences with AI implementation. We found that the most common challenges arose when organizations tried to integrate AI into daily operations and monitor and maintain those tools over time. Specific barriers included difficulty evaluating whether AI was performing as expected, limited guidance on communicating with patients about AI use, a lack of resources for staff training, limited financial resources, and the absence of formal governance structures. Successful strategies for overcoming these challenges drew on shared knowledge and structured support provided by the program, as well as learning from peer organizations. These findings offer practical guidance for SNO leaders planning or managing AI adoption, and contribute to a broader conversation about what is required to implement AI safely and effectively in healthcare settings that serve the most medically and socially vulnerable patients.

Background and ObjectivesPatient portals have become essential infrastructure for healthcare delivery following the 21st Century Cures Act, yet adoption remains inequitable. Understanding demographic and geographic determinants of portal activation is critical for addressing digital health disparities, particularly among neurology patients who face unique access barriers. We examined the demographic, geographic, and neighborhood-level factors associated with patient portal activation among neurology patients at multiple geographic scales in the Washington, DC metropolitan area. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 72,417 adult neurology patients seen at two academic medical centers sharing an electronic health record in Washington, DC (February 2021-February 2026). We examined portal activation using multivariable logistic regression and geographic analysis at four nested scales: the metropolitan catchment area, DCs eight wards, individual census tracts (via geocoded patient addresses), and individual DC residents. ResultsPortal activation was 64.7% overall. Activation varied by race/ethnicity (Non-Hispanic White 76.1%, Non-Hispanic Black 57.0%, Non-Hispanic Asian 57.6%, Hispanic 55.0%) and geography (DC Ward 2: 82.0% vs. Ward 7: 48.0%). Ward-level educational attainment (r = 0.948), broadband access (r = 0.889), and income (r = 0.811) were strongly correlated with activation. Within individual wards, Non-Hispanic White patients activated at 84-91% while Non-Hispanic Black patients activated at 48-64%, demonstrating that neighborhood resources alone do not explain disparities. DiscussionPatient portal activation is shaped by demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic factors operating at multiple levels. Persistent within-ward racial disparities indicate that geographically targeted interventions must be paired with culturally tailored approaches to achieve digital health equity.

BackgroundArtificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) are among the fastest-growing domains in NIH research funding, but whether children have shared equitably in this expansion is unknown. We characterized pediatric representation in NIH AI/ML funding from fiscal years (FY) 2020 to 2024. MethodsNIH grant data were obtained from Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results bulk files for FY2020 to FY2024. AI/ML grants were identified using the NIH Research, Condition, and Disease Categorization "Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence" category, and pediatric grants using the "Pediatric" category. Subprojects were excluded. Grants were deduplicated within each fiscal year by core project number for trend analyses and across all years retaining the most recent fiscal year for cross-sectional totals. Disease areas were identified by keyword searches of titles and abstracts. ResultsAcross FY2020 to FY2024, 5,624 unique NIH AI/ML grants totaling $3,371 million were identified. Of these, 836 grants (14.9%) were classified as pediatric, representing $401 million (11.9%) of total NIH AI/ML funding. Although this share was consistent with the historically reported overall NIH pediatric funding baseline of approximately 10% to 12%, it remained substantially below the US pediatric population share of approximately 22%. The pediatric share of NIH AI/ML funding declined from 12.3% in FY2020 to 10.8% in FY2024, despite growth in absolute pediatric funding. Indexed to FY2020, pediatric AI/ML funding grew approximately 2.6-fold compared with 3.0-fold growth in the total portfolio. Across disease areas, unadjusted adult/general-to-pediatric funding ratios ranged from 2.0-fold in mental health to 9.8-fold in cancer. ConclusionsPediatric representation in NIH AI/ML funding remained low and declined over time as the overall portfolio expanded. These findings suggest that growth in NIH AI/ML investment has not been matched by proportional gains for pediatric research.

Background: The urgent care departments in Europe face a structural paradox: accelerating digitalisation is accompanied by a patient population that is disproportionately unable to engage with standard digital tools. An internal analysis at the Emergency Department (Akutafdelingen) of Nordsjaellands Hospital in Hilleroed, Denmark found that 43% of emergency patients struggle with digital solutions - a figure that reflects the predictable composition of acute care populations rather than any individual failing. Objective: This paper presents the design, iterative development, and secondary validation of the ED Adaptive Interface (v5): a prototype adaptive patient terminal developed in response to this challenge. The system operationalises what the author terms impairment-first design - a methodology that treats the most constrained patient experience as the primary design problem and derives the standard experience as a subset. The interface configures itself in under ten seconds via nurse-led setup, adapting across four axes of impairment: visual, motor, speech, and cognitive. System: Version 4 supports five accessibility modes, a heatmap pain assessment grid, a Privacy and Dignity panel, a live workflow tracker with care notifications, structured dual-category help requests, and plain-language medical term definitions across four languages. Version 5, reported here for the first time, introduces a Condition Worsening Escalation button, a Referral Pathway Display, a "Why Am I Waiting?" triage explainer, a Symptom Progression Log, MinSP/Yellow Card Scan simulation, expanded language support (seven languages: English, Danish, Arabic with full RTL layout, Turkish, Romanian, Polish, and Somali), and an expanded ten-item Communication Board. The entire system runs as a single 79-kilobyte HTML file with zero infrastructure requirements. Methods: To base the design on patient-generated evidence, two independent social media threads were subjected to an inductive thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke, 2006): a primary corpus of 83 entries in the Facebook group Foreigners in Denmark (collected March 2026) and a corroborating corpus in an international community group in the Aarhus region (collected April 2026). All identifiers in both datasets were fully anonymised under GDPR Article 89 research provisions prior to analysis. No participants were contacted. Generative AI tools were used to assist with drafting, writing, and prototype code development; all scientific content, data collection, analysis, and conclusions are the sole responsibility of the authors. Results: The first discourse corpus produced five major themes corresponding to the five problem areas the prototype was designed to address: system navigation and triage literacy gaps (31 entries); language and cultural barriers (6 entries); communication failures during care (5 entries); staff overload and capacity constraints (8 entries); and pain and severity assessment failures (14 entries). The corroborating dataset supported all five themes and introduced two additional themes: differential treatment of international patients and medical gaslighting as a long-term pattern of patient advocacy failure. One structural finding - the five most-liked comments incorrectly criticised the original poster for self-referring when she had received explicit 1813 telephone triage approval - directly inspired the Referral Pathway Display and "Why Am I Waiting?" features in v5. Conclusions: The convergence of design rationale and independent social evidence across all five problem categories suggests that impairment-first design is not a niche accessibility concern but a structural approach to healthcare interface quality. The prototype is ready for a structured clinical pilot using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and semi-structured staff interviews. The long-term roadmap includes full MinSP integration, hospital PMS connectivity, and clinical validation.

BackgroundThe rapid proliferation of digital platforms has transformed health information access but has also led to increased exposure to misinformation. Existing research lacks standardized tools to quantify individual-level exposure to health misinformation in a comprehensive manner. ObjectiveTo develop a novel composite index--the Misinformation Exposure Index (MEI)--to measure multidimensional exposure to health misinformation among social media users. MethodsA questionnaire-based pilot study was conducted among a young adult population to assess patterns of health information exposure, source utilization, trust, and behavioural responses. The MEI was developed using a multi-domain framework comprising Exposure Frequency, Source Diversity and Risk, Trust in Information, and Behavioural Response. Responses were scored using Likert scales and weighted domain contributions to generate a composite score ranging from 0 to 100. ResultsParticipants demonstrated moderate to high engagement with digital platforms for health information, with reliance on both formal and informal sources. Variability in trust and verification behaviours was observed, with a proportion of participants reporting adoption of health-related practices without professional consultation. Composite MEI scores indicated that most individuals fell within the moderate exposure category, with a subset exhibiting high exposure characterized by frequent engagement with high-risk sources and behavioural influence. ConclusionThe MEI provides a novel and comprehensive framework for quantifying health misinformation exposure by integrating exposure patterns, source characteristics, trust, and behavioural outcomes. The index has potential applications in public health surveillance and intervention design. Further validation through large-scale studies is warranted to establish its reliability and generalizability.

Background Ever since the COVID-19 vaccine became available, vaccinations in adolescents lagged behind adults. Whether adolescent vaccination rates were higher in states with "Minor Consent" policies remains unknown. Methods We accessed adolescent (aged 12-17) county-level vaccine administration data from the CDC (12/2020-05/2023). Our outcomes were COVID-19 vaccination counts for: 1) initial dose, 2) completed series doses, and 3) booster doses. Panel Poisson regression models with state and time random effects, seasonal fixed effects, log-population offsets, and adult vaccination rates were estimated to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRR), testing the association between residing in a state with a Minor Consent policy and COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Results Overall, for the initial dose and complete series, there was no difference in adolescent COVID-19 vaccination between states with or without Minor Consent policies. However, we found that Minor Consent policies were associated with lower COVID-19 booster doses (IRR = 0.582; 95% CI: 0.409, 0.828; p = 0.0026). This association was not found in urban counties (IRR = 0.867; CI = 0.722, 1.043; p = 0.1295), but only in rural counties (IRR = 0.541; CI = 0.401, 0.730; p < 0.0001). Conclusions Minor Consent policies were not associated with higher adolescent COVID-19 vaccination. Rather, we found that Minor Consent policies were associated with lower adolescent vaccination for booster doses in rural counties. Despite minimal evidence of impact, states continue to implement Minor Consent vaccination policies. Future research should investigate not just other vaccines, but also how Minor Consent policies impact parental trust in public health more broadly.

Network-based epidemic models have been instrumental in understanding how contact structure shapes infectious disease dynamics, yet widely used frameworks such as Erd[o]s-Renyi, configuration-model, and stochastic block networks do not explicitly capture the combination of fully accessible (saturated) within-group interactions and constrained between-group connectivity characteristic of many real-world settings. Here, we introduce the Multi-Clique (MC) network model, a generative framework in which individuals are organised into fully connected cliques representing stable contact groups (e.g., households, classrooms, or workplaces), with a limited number of external connections governing inter-group transmission. Using stochastic susceptible-infectious-recovered (SIR) simulations on degree-matched networks, we compare epidemic dynamics on MC networks with those on classical random graph models. Despite having an identical mean degree, MC networks exhibit systematically distinct behaviour, including slower epidemic growth, reduced peak prevalence, increased fade-out probability, and delayed time to peak. These effects arise from rapid within but constrained between clique transmission, creating structural bottlenecks that standard models do not capture. The MC framework provides an interpretable, data-driven representation of recurrent contact structure, with parameters that map directly to observable quantities such as household and classroom sizes. By isolating the role of intergroup connectivity, the model offers a basis for evaluating targeted intervention strategies that reduce between-group mixing while preserving within-group interactions. Our results highlight the importance of explicitly representing the real-life clique-based network structure in epidemic models and suggest that classical degree-matched networks may systematically overestimate epidemic speed and intensity in structured populations.

Machine learning models trained on observational data from one environment frequently fail when deployed in another, because standard learning algorithms exploit spurious correlations alongside causal ones. Invariant learning methods address this problem by seeking representations that support stable prediction across training environments, but their behavior on tabular data remains poorly characterized. We present CausTab, a gradient variance regularization framework for causal invariant representation learning on mixed tabular data. CausTab penalizes the variance of parameter gradients across training environments, providing a richer invariance signal than the scalar penalty used by Invariant Risk Minimization (IRM). We provide formal results showing that the gradient variance penalty is zero at causally invariant solutions and positive at solutions that rely on spurious features. Through experiments on synthetic data across three spurious-correlation regimes, four cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), and four hospital systems in the UCI Heart Disease dataset, we demonstrate that: (1) IRM consistently degrades relative to standard empirical risk minimization (ERM) on tabular data, losing up to 13.8 AUC points in spurious-dominant settings, a failure we trace mechanistically to penalty collapse during training; (2) CausTab matches or exceeds ERM in every experimental condition; (3) CausTab achieves consistently better probability calibration than both ERM and IRM; and (4) invariant learning methods fail when environments differ in outcome prevalence rather than in spurious feature correlations, a boundary condition we characterize both empirically and theoretically. We introduce the Spurious Dominance Index (SDI), a practical scalar diagnostic for determining whether a dataset requires invariant learning, and validate it across all experimental settings

Background Persons experiencing homelessness (PEH) have a 2-3-fold greater risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality compared with domiciled counterparts. Evidence has repeatedly shown elevated chronic disease burden, reduced access to many types of care, and lower utilization of medication to control CVD risk factors in clinical settings dedicated to providing health care to PEH. There are federally funded health clinics targeting barriers to access for patient populations experiencing homelessness in place. These clinics are frequently overwhelmed and limited by their scope to primary care despite well documented burdens of co- and tri-morbid conditions. There is scarce evidence on differences between access, quality, and experiences of care delivered relative to other safety-net models. Method The 2022 Health Center Patient Survey (HCPS) was collected on behalf of the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). The HCPS is a nationally representative, three-staged, sample-based survey collected via 1:1 interview with clinic patients. The survey assessed sociodemographics, health conditions and behaviors, access to and utilization of care, and patients? experiences with comprehensive services they received at HRSA-funded Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), including community health centers (CHC), healthcare for the homeless (HCH) clinics, and public housing primary care (PHPC) clinics. One hundred and three unique awardees and 318 health center sites were recruited, and 4,414 patient interviews were completed. Investigators analyzed patient characteristics and multiple survey items related to AHA?s Essential 8 metrics for differences between HCH and CHC patient responses. Results HCH clinics had fewer elderly patients (~7%) than CHCs (~17%). Reported 7-day physical activity measures, average sleep below 7 hours per day, and Lifetime smoking (>100 cigarettes; OR=4.2, p<0.001) were all greatest among HCH patients. Fewer HCH patients reported ever having or recent lipid tests (both p<0.001). HCH patients were more likely to report hypertension (p=0.003) but less likely to report receiving nutrition advice (all p<0.05). HCH patients were less likely to be taking medication even if it was prescribed (p<0.001). Adjustments for differences in age or CVD history were able to explain some observed differences but increased the magnitude of other disparities. Conclusions CVD burden differs across the various HRSA funding mechanisms for clinics, as do demographics and multiple metrics of health behaviors and biomarkers of cardiovascular health. Greater disease burden in HCH patients is likely compounded by increased risk factors and underperformance in providing health education interventions.

Background Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) often have incomplete methods reporting despite widespread adoption of the CONSORT guideline. The editorial process is supposed to detect these shortcomings and request clarifications from authors, which is time-consuming. We developed an LLM-based CONSORT Rohe Nordberg Report that highlights which CONSORT items appear fully or partially reported and checks page references claimed by authors, and then creates follow up questions for authors to more easily correct missing information. Methods This parallel-arm, superiority RCT will randomize eligible RCT submissions (after desk screening) 1:1 into intervention (editorial team and authors receive the Rohe Nordberg Report) or control (standard editorial review only). The primary outcome is whether manuscripts improve their reporting of CONSORT items in the Methods and Results sections between the original submission and first revision. This will be assessed by blinded human reviewers who evaluate the textual changes for improvements between the original and revised manuscripts for each relevant CONSORT item. Secondary outcomes include time to editorial decisions, rejection and non-resubmission rates, if authors can correctly identify where CONSORT items are reported, and extent of revisions. Human evaluators will be blinded to whether the manuscript was in the intervention or control group. Discussion By providing authors and the editorial team with specific follow up questions for each underreported CONSORT item, we hypothesize that basic underreporting will be more efficiently detected and corrected. Using blinded human reviewers as the primary outcome assessors ensures a rigorous, unbiased evaluation. If successful, this approach may help align manuscripts more closely with CONSORT standards, ultimately benefiting evidence synthesis.

Medical male circumcision (MMC) is an established HIV prevention intervention, yet concerns persist that circumcised men may adopt higher-risk sexual behaviours following the procedure. Evidence from observational studies has been inconsistent, partly because many analyses do not adequately distinguish behaviours that occur before circumcision from those that occur afterward. This study assessed the association between MMC and subsequent sexual behaviours while demonstrating how population-based cross-sectional survey data can be adapted to address this temporal challenge. We analysed nationally representative data from the 2024 Zambia Demographic and Health Survey (ZDHS), including men aged 15 - 59 years who reported their circumcision status. Men who had undergone medical circumcision were compared with uncircumcised men using a matched pseudo-cohort framework that reconstructed temporal ordering based on age at circumcision. Propensity score overlap weighting was applied to improve comparability between circumcised and uncircumcised men, and odds ratios were estimated using logistic regression models incorporating overlap weights and accounting for the complex survey design. Sexual behaviour outcomes occurring after circumcision included condom non-use at last sexual intercourse, multiple sexual partners in the past 12 months, self-reported sexually transmitted infection (STI) symptoms, and composite measures of sexual risk behaviour. The analysis included 9,609 men, of whom 33.3% were medically circumcised. MMC was associated with lower odds of condom non-use at last sexual intercourse (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67 - 0.85) and lower odds of reporting any sexual risk behaviour (aOR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.72 - 0.95). No meaningful associations were observed between MMC and reporting multiple sexual partners, self-reported STI symptoms, or higher levels of composite sexual risk behaviour. In this population-based study, MMC was not associated with sexual risk compensation under routine programme conditions within the overlap population defined by the weighting scheme, supporting the behavioural safety of MMC and illustrating the value of explicitly addressing temporality when analysing behavioural outcomes using cross-sectional survey data.

Introduction The link between Human Papillomavirus (HPV) and cancer is well-established. In Singapore, bivalent HPV vaccines are subsidised for females, but not males. Economic analysis of HPV vaccination has generally assessed the costs to the health system, but this may not be as relevant to individual decision-making as potential lost income. We estimated the impact of bivalent HPV 16/18 vaccination on sick leave, unemployment, and premature mortality as a function of age and sex to understand the broader impact of HPV-related cancers. Methods We developed a population-level economic model to estimate lifetime income losses by diagnosis age, sex and cancer type. We applied sex- and cancer-specific Cox regressions to the Singapore Cancer Registry for annual predicted survival from 1992 to 2022. These were combined with census and employment data to estimate HPV-associated income losses in Singapore. Attributable fractions and vaccine effectiveness data for HPV 16/18 from the literature were used to estimate the effectiveness of bivalent HPV vaccination. Structural sensitivity analysis examined the role of 80% population coverage conferring herd immunity. Results The registry contained 17,294 individuals with an HPV-associated cancer diagnosis. Lost income was greatest for cervical cancer due to its high prevalence, however the losses per diagnosis were highest for oropharyngeal cancer. Bivalent HPV vaccination led to income benefits of $SGD1,397 [$895 to $1,838] in girls and -$62 [-$76 to -$48] in boys. A gender-neutral HPV vaccination of 80% of 15-year-old Singaporeans, conferring herd immunity, would have lifetime income protective benefits of $24.4m [$14.2m, $33.7m] per cohort, a five-fold return on investment. Conclusions In addition to avoiding healthcare costs and lost quality of life, parents should consider vaccination as a means of avoiding potential income losses. A national policy of gender-neutral HPV vaccination could deliver substantial income protection due to both individual vaccine protection and herd immunity.

Introduction. Empirical evidence linking specific national structural policies to the provision of key HIV services in low- and middle-income settings remains scarce. This study addresses the research gap by quantifying the within-country relationships between six national structural policy indicators and the presence of the HIV prevention service component targeted at sex workers in Southeast Asia. Methods. We constructed a balanced panel dataset covering eight Southeast Asian countries from 2018 to 2025 from the UNAIDS Global AIDS Monitoring (GAM) framework. We used Fixed-Effects (FE) and Random-Effects (RE) models to analyse the relationships, with the FE model selected as the more statistically appropriate estimator. We enhanced robustness by using clustered standard errors and one-period lagged explanatory variables. Results. The primary finding from the FE model indicated a statistically significant and positive contemporaneous association between the existence of legal or administrative barriers to social protection (barriers_spi,t) and the presence of HIV prevention services for sex workers ({beta} = 0.8531; p < 0.001). However, the robustness check revealed a statistically significant negative association between the two when using the lagged barrier variable (barriers_spi,t-1), suggesting a decline in HIV prevention service availability over time ({beta} = -0.3540; p < 0.05). We did not find any other policy variable's coefficient to be statistically significant in the FE models. Conclusions. While the immediate recognition (contemporaneous effect) of structural barriers to access social protection may occur alongside prioritised HIV prevention service provision, the sustained presence of these impediments acts as a long-term constraint that undermines the effectiveness and sustainability of targeted HIV programmes. National HIV programmes must urgently prioritise the removal of structural barriers to ensure long-term service stability for key populations.